Home / Latest News / 66 selected in open Competition and Trained for a Year to be Judges, sent back home

66 selected in open Competition and Trained for a Year to be Judges, sent back home


They could not be appointed as Magistrates because the vacancies estimated by the High Court were never notified.

They are Judges no more
They are Judges no more

Sixty-six law graduates who cleared written tests and interviews to be selected as Magistrates and underwent year-long training have been relegated to candidate level, and have been asked to compete again if they want to become judges.

As many as 22 of them approached the Supreme Court seeking a direction to the Kerala government and the high court to accommodate them against future vacancies, including those in gram nyayalayas (rural courts), being created by the state government.

The 66 candidates could not be appointed as magistrates because the vacancies estimated by the high court were never notified.

A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice U U Lalit said it was a settled position in law that no state government could fill future vacancies with candidates recruited in the past. “If that is allowed, then a state government can recruit hundreds of persons and keep filling vacancies as and when they arise in future, frustrat ing the subsequent batches of eligible candidates,“ it said.

Senior advocates L Nageswar Rao and V Giri, appearing for the 22 candidates, tried to convince the court. They were supported by the state government, which was represented by senior advocate R Basanta.

But the court asked the Kerala government to show the governor’s approval for creation of the 74 posts when the advertisement for recruitment was issued in March 2013.

Pursuant to the advertisement for posts in the Kerala Judicial Service, the candidates cleared tests, followed by interviews conducted by the high court. “All of them (the 66) successfully completed their training on December 15, 2015.

However, the training was continued as appointments were not made,“ they said. Finding themselves in a tricky situation, they pleaded, “It is understood that enough number of vacancies are available to accommodate all 66 candidates who have completed their training.“

But the bench stuck to its stand that the law did not permit past recruits to be accommodated in future vacancies.

However, giving some relief, it told the state government and the high court that during subsequent recruitments, the 66 candidates, if they wished to compete again, could be given some relaxation in eligibility criteria or some weightage. TNN

Related News @ LatestLaws.in-

Upholding Justice

19.4.2016- High Court removes 15 Judges for “Doubtful Integrity”, “Negligence” and “Poor performance”

Suicide by a Judicial Officer

10.4.2016- Top 5 Judges booked by Police as Accused for abetting Suicide by a Judicial Officer

Supreme Court of India

23.3.2016- SC reminds High Courts & Lower Court Judges of the Dos and Don’ts attached to their Duty, Read Order

Modi Govt. to SC

7.3.2016- Modi Govt. wants SC to add “Merit and Integrity” as “Prime Criteria” for appointment of SC & HC Judges

Facebook Comments

Check Also

IPR violations

Pendency of IPR cases: SC asks HC to submit details of No. of Joint Registrar’s recording evidence everyday

December 16,2017: SC wants to treat work done by HC in this regard particularly in the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) cases as a “yardstick” so that if successful, it can be replicated across India. The Supreme Court, while taking note ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *