Home / Latest News / Justice Katju criticises SC Judgment: Full Bench summons him in person to argue & justify his views

Justice Katju criticises SC Judgment: Full Bench summons him in person to argue & justify his views

October,18,2016:

Justice Katju had in his Blog criticised the SC Bench’s Judgment in the Soumya Rape and Murder case, calling it a “grave error”.

Justice-Katju
Justice-Katju

It is perhaps for the first time in history that Supreme Court Bench on Monday treated a Facebook blog of a former Supreme Court judge, Justice Markandey Katju, into a review petition.

Apex Court asked him to personally appear in court to “debate” his critical views of the Bench’s verdict commuting death penalty in the sensitive 2011 Soumya rape and murder case.

A three-judge Full Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi, P.C. Pant and U.U. Lalit took a suo motu cognizance of Justice Katju’s blog wherein he had criticised the Supreme Court judges for relying on “hearsay evidence” to commute the death penalty of the sole convict in the case.

The SC Bench has summoned Justice Katju to appear in the court on November 11.

Justice Katju’s views were expressed in the Facebook blog – Satyam Bruyat.

The blog published on September 17 had castigated the Bench for believing “hearsay evidence” that Soumya jumped off the train instead of being pushed out by Govindaswamy.

Justice Katju had written in the blog that even a student of law in a law college knows this elementary principle that hearsay evidence is inadmissible,

The entire blog of Justice Katju was reproduced in the court order.

In the Judgment Justice Lalit had observed that as per record if she had died from the injuries sustained from the jump, Govindaswamy cannot be held guilty of murder.

SC had ruled it is convinced of the fact that accused had attacked her in the train, that he committed rape, for which life imprisonment was confirmed. But was not convinced that he committed murder.

SC said that convict cannot be held responsible for victim trying to jump and escape.

On the contrary Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, who was appearing for Soumya’s mother,questioned whether a person who “forced” a the victim to jump out of a train is not equally liable.


Related News @ LatestLaws.in-

28.9.2016 – Justice Markandey Katju booked for Sedition after offering Kashmir and Bihar to Pakistan

27.9.2016 – Justice Katju trolled for his Bihar ‘Joke’, Nitish says he has disease of seeing his name in NewspapersAmitabh Bachchan

20.9.2016- Amitabh Bachchan replies to Justice Katju: You are Right, I don’t have anything in my HeadJustice Markandey Katju opines

17.9.2016- Justice Markandey Katju tells why Amitabh Bachchan has ‘Nothing in his Head’

10.9.2016- Justice Katju attacks Kejriwal: ‘There is Nothing in his Head, he is Reactionary and Feudal’

14.8.2016- Who are the Real Indians: Justice Markandey Katju seems to know all the Answer

29.6.2015- Justice Katju sues Parliament in Supreme Court over his remarks on Gandhi and Bose: Read the Petition here

Facebook Comments

Check Also

SC on Parsi Conversion

After being urged by SC, Parsi Panchayat has decided to allow the Parsi Women married outside community to attend prayers in Fire Temple

December 14,2017: Pachayat’s radical decision was prompted by Supreme Court urging Parsi Community to take a more “progressive” stand on this issue. On Thursday, Valsad Parsi Panchayat in Gujarat has decided to allow the two Parsi women married outside community to ...

One comment

  1. Prakash Chandra gupta advocate patna high cort

    Since the comment was of a ex S C judge. So S C took cognizance , very rightly invited him for a for open debate in court

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *