Home / Latest News / SC adds more Teeth to DV Act, now all Women & even Minors can be prosecuted in Cr. Court, Read Order

SC adds more Teeth to DV Act, now all Women & even Minors can be prosecuted in Cr. Court, Read Order

October,9,2016:

The term “adult male” contained in the Act was found to be “discriminatory” by SC

Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court  has in a landmark verdict widened the scope of the Domestic Violence Act by deleting of the words “Adult Male” from its text.

This has cleared the path for prosecution of family Women and even non-adults for subjecting a woman relative to harassment and violence.

The apex court has directed striking down of the two words from Section 2(q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which relates to respondents who can be sued and prosecuted under the Act.

The statute aims at prosecuting all thioe who harasses a married woman in her matrimonial home.

The apex court while evaluating earlier decisions observed that the microscopic difference between adult and non adult, male and female, in the light of the object sought to be achieved by the DV Act, is neither substantial nor real, also it does it have any legal rational in relation to the objects desired by the legislation.

A bench of Justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman have cleared the path for prosecution of any person irrespective of gender or age under the DV Act on the reasoning that it violates right to equality under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court bench said that the term “adult male” contained in the Act was found to be “discriminatory”.

Supreme Court Judgement on Domestic Violence Act by latest laws team on Scribd

Related News @ LatestLaws.in-

18.9.2016 – Govt to Supreme Court: Moms-in-Law can’t sue Daughter-in-Law under Domestic Violence Act

Misuse of Dowry Laws

21.8.2016- SC Constitution Bench upholds bar on “Menace” Mechanical Arrests in Dowry Cases

DV Act being misused, feels Govt.

12.5.2016- Domestic Violence Act being misused: Center Govt. cites NCRB Data

22.6.2015- Wife imposed Rs. 1 lakh cost for misusing Domestic Violence Laws- Read Full Judgment

Do not take Hyper Technical approach in Matrimonial Cases

5.6.2016- SC warns Trial Courts: Do not take hyper-technical approach in Matrimonial Cases, Read Judgment

Arbaaz Khan & Malaika Arora Khan Headed For DIVORCE

12.3.2016- Matrimonial Breakups: After Celebrities Karishma Kapoor, Farhan Akhtar and Hritik Roshan now Malaika Arora files for Divorce Decree

Karisma & Sunjay Kapoor's Divorce battle

2.3.2016- Supreme Court directs Karisma & Sunjay Kapoor’s Lawyers to settle the Divorce battle

15.12.2015- High Court miffed at unabated misuse of Sec. 498A IPC despited repeated Supreme Court directions, Read Judgment

Stridhan belongs to Women

21.11.2015- Supreme Court expounds despite Judicial Separation wife can still claim Stridhan

16.8.2015- Wife partying all night not a Matrimonial Cruelty, High Court

14.7.2015- After SC rap – Why no uniformity in Divorce Laws, Govt. wakens to amend Law

 Read Laws @ LatestLaws.in-





Facebook Comments

Check Also

IPR violations

Pendency of IPR cases: SC asks HC to submit details of No. of Joint Registrar’s recording evidence everyday

December 16,2017: SC wants to treat work done by HC in this regard particularly in the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) cases as a “yardstick” so that if successful, it can be replicated across India. The Supreme Court, while taking note ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *