Home / Latest News / Supreme Court: Death Penalty breaches Reformative Theory of Punishment

Supreme Court: Death Penalty breaches Reformative Theory of Punishment

April,8,2017:

Law Commission of India had recommended abolition of the death penalty for all crimes other than terrorism.

Supreme Court commuted to life term capital punishment awarded to a convict for murder, noting that death penalty “breaches reformative theory of punishment under criminal law”.

Apex Court Bench comprising of Justice P C Ghose & Justice Rohinton F Nariman also underlined that the death penalty had in fact become a “distinctive feature” of the criminal law in India, and that Supreme Court had been encouraging discussion and debate on this subject.

SC Bench expounded that,“Today when the capital punishment has become a distinctive feature of death penalty apparatus in India which somehow breaches reformative theory of the punishment under the criminal law..”.

Bench recalled that the Apex court had recently referred to the Law Commission to study issue of death penalty in India to “allow for an up-to-date & informed discussion & debate on this subject”.

In its 262nd Report, Bench noted, that Law Commission of India had recommended abolition of death penalty for all crimes other than the terrorism-related offences and waging war offences affecting the national security.

Making these observations, Supreme Court stated that it was not inclined to award the capital punishment to convict in the murder case.

“Therefore, confinement till natural life of the accused respondent shall fulfill the requisite criteria of punishment in peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case,” it held.

Supreme Court was hearing an appeal by the Maharashtra Govt, which had pressed for the death penalty for Nisar Ramzan Sayyed, who had in October 2010 set his pregnant wife on fire & thrown his minor son into the blaze, causing their death. While the trial court sent Sayyed to gallows, the HC had acquitted him for want of concrete proof.

Apex Court, after taking note of dying declaration of his wife and the other circumstantial evidence, held that Sayyed’s guilt was proved beyond the reasonable doubt but this was not “rarest of the rare case” that warranted him to be sentenced to death.

Related News @ LatestLaws.com-

22.3.2017 –  Law Commission recommends abolition of Death Penalty in all crimes except Terror related offences, Read Report

21.11.2016 – India has opposed UN Resolution for complete Worldwide moratorium on Death Penalty

19.9.2016 – Supreme Court innovates 25 Years Jail Sentence in lieu of Death Penalty, Read Judgment

5.2.2016- ‘Rarest of Rare’ Death penalty now not so rare in India as 11 convicts awarded Death by WB Court

31.8.2015- Law Commission of India gives 6:3 split verdict on Death Penalty,Read the Full Report

Read Full Report on LatestLaws.com-

Facebook Comments

Check Also

Supreme Court, New Delhi

Lt. Colonel Purohit, accused in Malegaon Blast, Granted Bail by the Supreme Court

August 21,2017: Lt Colonel has spent nine years behind the bars after being arrested in the year 2008. Supreme Court has granted the bail to Lt Colonel Purohit in 2008 Malegaon blast case. Purohit had moved SC challenging Bombay HC’s ...

2 comments

  1. prudhvinarayana

    if cow killing in not creating communal voilence in a country dominated by Hindus, what else will create problems. The courts which cannot look at the ground level reality has been passing certain confusing orders…. they are not sure of what they are saying.

  2. Will there be a real reform even after person come out of Jail . Difference to be looked between offence committed with respect to rarest of rare cases. Their Mind Set. And what they would convey to society. Eg ; Afzal Guru , Ajmal Kasab,they were sentenced to death for their crime by court ,It is rarest of rare cases. Now will they be reformed ? is an issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *