Home / Latest News / Supreme Court disappointed the Nation during Emergency, High Courts & section of Media saving grace, says Arun Jaitley

Supreme Court disappointed the Nation during Emergency, High Courts & section of Media saving grace, says Arun Jaitley

June,27,2015: It is not possible today for the world's largest democracy to become “dictatorial,” Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has said, while terming the Emergency imposed by the then Congress government in 1975 as the darkest phase of independent India.

Emergency Blues
Emergency Blues

Jaitley said Emergency was a phase, which showed that a democracy can be converted into a dictatorship by using some provisions of the Constitution and all the major institutions like bureaucracy, police, media and judiciary can collapse.

"I think, today the global awareness is in favor of the democracy and the kind of sanctions which can be imposed on a dictatorship itself can be a deterrent.”

"I think, the media is also strong, the polity is strong and the global institutions are also strong. The world would not accept the world's largest democracy becoming dictatorial today," Jaitley told PTI in an interview.

A major controversy broke out recently after BJP patriarch L. K. Advani expressed concerns that "forces that can crush democracy are stronger" now and that Emergency-like situation could emerge again. The comments were seen by the Congress as being aimed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while Aam Aadmi Party felt it was the "first indictment" of Modi's politics.

Other opposition parties also said that Advani's comments should be taken seriously.

Without referring to Advani's comments, Jaitley said the media censorship is not possible today "because of the technology itself."

"You have news traveling through the Internet and the Internet can't be censored," Jaitley said.

Jaitley said that the polity was strong even during the Emergency, but “the media had by and large caved in."

Recalling his own experiences from the Emergency days, Jaitley said he hopes that "the judiciary today is far more independent and does not cave in to any dictatorial tendencies as it caved in during emergency."

"But the fact that detentions are no longer possible without a basis, media censorship is no longer possible and hopefully judiciary would be far more independent, it would not be possible for anybody to convert a democracy into a dictatorship without these three limbs," he said.

Jaitley said the tradition of dynasty and dynastic political parties started with Emergency.

It has been 40 years since Emergency was imposed and it was the "darkest phase of Indian democracy" in post-independence India, he said.

"This was a phase where for two reasons, Emergency was proclaimed. The first reason was that Indira Gandhi's position as Prime Minister was challenged because she was found to have indulged in corrupt practices in election. And second was she wanted to use the power of dictatorship in emergency to convert India into a dynastic rule," the Minister said.

Jaitley said that Emergency was a phase "where civil liberty was suspended, personal liberty had no value, lakhs of people were detained, media was censored and judicial independence was completely throttled."

"I was a student leader at that time. I was on the forefront of fighting the Emergency. I was one of the first persons to be arrested during the Emergency. And then finally after 19 months in prison, when Emergency was relaxed, I had an opportunity to participate in the election campaign."

Looking back at "vulnerability of institutions" at that time, Jaitley said a large number of false cases – running into thousands and lakhs – were registered against people.

"Not one policemen got up and said I would not register a false case. Detention orders against thousands and lakhs of people were passed. Not one collector got up and said I would not sign on a fake detention order.”

Emergency- Indian Express
Emergency- Indian Express

"Except The Indian Express and The Statesman all major newspapers had collapsed and started praising the dictatorship. This was the vulnerability of the media. Even though the High Courts displayed some courage in saying that detainees have the right to move to the Supreme Court for illegal detention, the Supreme Court by a majority of four against one reversed that judgment. Calling the Supreme Court “the most disappointing” amongst the various institutions during the Emergency, Jaitley said what the apex court did during the Emergency was to “put a final nail in the coffin”. “Amongst the various institutions, unquestionably the Supreme Court was the most disappointing one,” he said.

"I think, the emergency was also the darkest phase of the Supreme Court," he said.  “The political parties and the activists were substantially still fighting it out. So, the media had surrendered, the bureaucracy had surrendered,” he said.

Jaitley said there was a small group of lawyers and media persons, as also the political prisoners, who fought the Emergency.

"Is it possible to replicate such a situation now? I have my doubts," he said.

"This country demonstrated in the post Emergency election in 1977 that India is not willing to be suffocated. And therefore the strong reaction against Emergency would scare.

"But more important are three other incidental factors which have occurred since then. Firstly, the Janata Party Government led by Morarji Desai brought one great institutional reform and amended the Constitution to provide that during Emergency Article 25 which is the right to life and liberty cannot be suspended.

"Therefore if right to life and liberty remains, unfair detention would no longer be possible.”

"As far as the media is concerned, the technology has made censorship impossible. So during emergency, it was possible to post a censor in every newspaper and censor the media. But today the satellite and the Internet have created a situation where technologically a censorship itself is not possible. And therefore to censor the media would be extremely difficult."

ARUN JAITLEY
ARUN JAITLEY
Jaitley said he was the president of Delhi University Students Union at that time and also the convener of the national organization of youth organizations, which Jayaprakash Narayan had created.

"After Indira Gandhi's election was set aside by the Allahabad High Court and in the Supreme Court she got a conditional stay, the popular movement seeking her resignation had picked up.

"So on evening of June 25, 1975, there was a meeting at Ramlila Maidan. After the meeting, when I came back home, the police came to arrest me in the middle of the night.

"I managed to escape while my father engaged the police in some argument since they did not have a detention order.”

"I went to a friend's house and in the morning collected a large number of students and organized the only protest on June 26 anywhere in the country against Emergency.

"So we burnt an effigy of Indira Gandhi and thereafter I was arrested as part of the protest. I was first kept in Tihar Jail, then taken to Ambala and brought back to Delhi. The police detained me under MISA."

Jaitley said the Emergency helped him in hardening his views on various democratic institutions.

"That is something in my political life which has helped me till today –- be it the need of free media, the need of independent judiciary, values of personal liberty.”

"These are values, I have cherished all along. And of course my stay in jail was an experience. Jail is a state of mind. If you are part of a struggle time passes by.

"I used to read a lot. Play a lot of badminton and volleyball. I was very fond of supervising the kitchen. We were only allowed Rs. 3 per day as food allowance, which was only enough for some roti and dal. I had seven cases against me," Jaitley said.

Lately at the launch of the book “The Emergency” by senior journalist Coomi Kapoor, a Consulting Editor with The Indian Express, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Friday said that he personally thinks it is not possible, simply because constitution now ensures that nobody can be detained without a cause and that media censorship in the age of technology “is no longer possible”.

“Is it possible to recreate that situation today? I personally don’t think so. Firstly, one good thing that the Janata government headed by Morarji Desai did was that it amended the constitution… and now the constitution even under Emergency made Article 21 non-suspendable. So Article 21 will always be there. So you can’t detain people without a cause,” Jaitley said.

The minister added that “because of technology today media censorship is no longer possible” with all the “digital space, the satellites, all technological abilities which were not there” existing now.

 

Source - ptinews.com

Facebook Comments

Check Also

Mobile

SC expounds: Using casteist remarks over the Phone in a Public Place amounts to Criminal Offence

November 20,2017: While dismissing the plea, SC Bench stated that,”He has to prove during the that he had not talked to the woman over the phone from a public place”. Supreme Court has expounded that using the casteist remarks over ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *